Liberals see Christie as a threat to Hillary

FI-Letter-to-the-EditorTo the Editor

Do you think Chris Christie is seen as a potential threat to Hillary Clinton’s presidential run?

I was surprised that Christie was covered on most of network TV. Christie was handed a lemon and made lemonade. He got lots of valuable free TV time, which he seemed to milk.

His response was logical, rational and reasonable. It reminded me of the Christie speech I heard at the Reagan Library. I loved the guy’s passion and his guts. They are a rarity, it seems, amongst today’s politicians. Had he not given the keynote speech for Romney and shortly thereafter warmly embraced Obama, to a fault, I might’ve still considered him for the presidency.

I don’t think Christie is out of it yet. The establishment and RINO Republicans and Democrats, I think, would prefer Christie to Rand Paul or Ted Cruz, or Mike Lee or Trey Gowdy as a presidential candidate. Christie would provide a lot of ink for the newspapers and air time for the TV. They’d love him. Nevertheless, the liberals and the Democrats are afraid of Christie because they’re afraid he would destroy Hillary.

Compare the way Christie handled his proportionately minor scandal versus the way President Obama handled his many outrageous scandals.

Christie fired people immediately and held himself accountable. Obama still is not being held responsible for the sins of his administration. Compare the way the national news media has handled Christie’s potential involvement in “bridgegate” by piling on and orchestrating an attack on Christie, while hypocritically letting Obama’s scandals fade away into the past.

 

Nick Fortunato
Greenwich

By participating in the comments section of this site you are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and User Agreement

© Hersam Acorn. All rights reserved. The Greenwich Post, 10 Corbin Drive, Floor 3, Darien, CT 06820

Designed by WPSHOWER

Powered by WordPress